Landlord loses appeal and is hit with £9,000 fine

Landlord loses appeal and is hit with £9,000 fine


Todays other news
The latest figures are up to the end of March...
When tenants complained, the landlord proceeded to evict them without...
The councillor was fined and has to pay costs...
The Renters’ Rights Act brought in important obligations on landlords....
The products and deals are available now...

A private landlord has been ordered to pay a £9,000 fine after losing an appeal against a council. 

Earlier this year Reigate & Banstead douncil discovered that a landlord was renting out their flat to mostly unrelated vulnerable elderly individuals without taking appropriate safety measures in relation to fire risk. 

When the tenants complained, the landlord proceeded to evict them without obtaining a possession order.

Reigate & Banstead issued the landlord with a Civil Penalty Fine under the Housing Act 2004 in respect to their failure to comply with the Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation Regulations 2006. 

They appealed the fine to the Residential Property Tribunal.

However, an appeal hearing upheld the fine, stating that the landlord had displayed an amateur and cavalier approach to safety. 

They also held that the council’s behaviour had at all times been “appropriate and proportionate”.

A council spokesperson says: “We have a robust approach to enforcement, and as this case demonstrates, we will do everything to protect our residents and members of the public. 

“We hope that the outcome of this case will serve as a reminder to other landlords in the borough that safety is paramount and that the council will use the full breadth of its powers to combat unscrupulous and negligent practices, to ensure the safety of tenants. 

“It is to this effect that we welcome the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act 2026 which supports this approach.

“The Renters Rights Act 2025 is bringing in new rights and responsibilities for landlords, letting agents and tenants. It is essential that landlords are compliant with the new law.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Subscribe to comments
Notify of
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
The latest figures are up to the end of March...
The councillor was fined and has to pay costs...
The most serious conditions were found in an outbuilding...
He breached Housing Act 2004, Housing (Wales) Act 2014, and...
A paper is to be published after the May local...
Wandsworth council proved the tenant was not the owner...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
An opinion piece by Trevor Abrahmsohn, managing director of Glentree...
The findings come from LRG’s Spring 2026 Lettings Report...
What is it and why is it becoming a major...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x