Lambeth council in south London has prosecuted a rogue landlord who illegally ran a bed-sit in the borough.
Frank Otuo of Putney was convicted of an offence under section 72 of the Housing Act 2004, namely managing and having control f an HMO in Streatham which was required to be licensed, but was not.
A council investigation found that between July 2019 and January 2020 more than five individuals were living at the unlicensed property and paying rent to Otuo who was the landlord. The total amount of rent paid was £4,240 a month.
On April this year Otuo was convicted for his actions and received a fine of £1,500 as well be being ordered to pay costs totalling £2,250.55.
Otuo subsequently sought to appeal his conviction and sentence but on the first day Otuo abandoned his appeal against his conviction. The court did hear an appeal relating to the sentence that had been imposed.
But the Judge and Magistrate decided not to alter the original decision and ordered that Otuo pay the council’s additional costs of £4,000 in relation to resisting the appeal.
In total the Crown Court fined Otuo £1,500 for the offence, or 45 days in prison if he didn’t pay up. He was also ordered to pay the victims surcharge of £32 and the council’s costs for both hearings totalling £6,250.
Otuo will now be added to the national rogue landlord database so other councils will be aware of the case and can act accordingly.
A council spokesperson says: “Unscrupulous landlords who put profit ahead of their tenants’ safety and wellbeing will not be tolerated in our borough and I welcome the court’s decision.
“It is important to recognise the tireless work of the council’s teams in ensuring this was uncovered.
“This prosecution shows that Lambeth Council takes unlicensed HMOs very seriously and will pursue those in breach to ensure the safety and wellbeing of all our residents.”
Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.
.jpg)
%20(002).png)
.png)
Join the conversation
Jump to latest comment and add your reply
Just proving that the legislation is there already for councils, we do not need more legislation!
A nice little earner
Not having a piece of paper (a licence) somehow puts tenants at risk? How? Were there other issues? That’s what they should concentrate on, not the fact they weren’t aware of yet another unlicensed property.
I don’t take this story at face value am I expected to believe this. Some bed-sit to accommodate 5 persons, that would need a 1930 size Terraced house or a very large Flat. Then the price per month £4’240. that’s looks like Rent for more than 2 houses or a mansion. The landlord should have paid the first fines and be done with it, so I think there must be more to this, he wasn’t done or appears not to be fined for over crowding, strange some bed-sit.
The Council costs excessive £6’250, shouldn’t be called cost’s, it couldn’t cost that much, so maybe they should be called charges, not only is the LL over charging but Council as well.
The Council team works tireless to ensuring this was uncovered, give me a break when did a Council employee (even team) do anything to make themselves tired not least to uncover this, more likely to my mind that a Tenant complained to Council, I suppose the Council team listened to them and that would be enough to make them tired.
Please login to comment