x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

New dire warning of rent rises as landlords end fixed-rate deals

There’s a new warning this morning that rents are set to soar as landlords struggle with much higher interest rate payments when their fixed rate deals finish.

The Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association says private landlords have for years been faced with a growing burden of regulatory and tax changes, which have increased their operating costs.  

And while until recently these additional costs have been offset by falling mortgage rates, the current sharp rises in buy to let mortgage rates risk making large numbers of private landlords’ business models uneconomic.  

Advertisement

IMLA says a finance firm has calculated that landlords needing new mortgage deals as old fixed rate offers have ended have, on average, seen the cost of their monthly interest payments jump by 75.7 per cent over the last year. 

The association warns: “While the majority of landlords remain on low fixed-rate loans for now, their interest rate payments will rise over the coming months as they reach the end of their current fixed deals. This will place additional and unwelcome upward pressure on rents – which have not kept pace with inflation over recent months.”

It says that between 2013 and mid-2022, estimated net yields for landlords exceeded buy to let mortgage rates. This meant landlords could achieve positive gearing, increasing their return on the equity they put into the property by increasing their debt.  

But IMLA notes: “Today, however, two-year fixed-rate mortgage rates are above average net yields, producing negative gearin. The relatively sudden increase in funding costs is causing a significant proportion of buy to let landlords to fail affordability assessments when seeking to refinance loans.  

“Some may seek to exit the market altogether, while others may be obliged to sell some properties and re-balance the debt on their portfolios.”

IMLA executive director Kate Davies comments:The private rental sector serves some some 4.6m households – the equivalent of 11m people – and represents approximately 19 per cent of the housing market. Maintaining the health of the sector is therefore essential if we are to manage the UK’s chronic housing shortage. 

“Our report highlights the tough environment that landlords currently find themselves in and, more concerningly, the outlook for the PRS and tenants if policymakers’ approach to the sector doesn’t change.

“Demand for rented housing is clearly high, and measures to increase tenant protections are important. However, the focus now needs to be on prompting increased investment in the sector and supporting landlords, whose operating costs risk  becoming unaffordable. If we don’t get the balance right, the result will be higher rents, and lower availability of properties – both of which are bad news for tenants and landlords.”

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Its going to get worse for tenants - a lot worse!

    icon

    Agreed, if Landlord's are hurting then they will either increase rents or sell.
    However, in Gove's head this is nothing to do with Government interference.
    The issue for us is how the hell can we be heard!

     
    Peter Why Do I Bother

    Andy,

    I asked the NRLA to send the section21 link to all its members, if 100k members sign it then it can be heard. If they do not send the link then we know who's side they are on. I will keep you all updated.

     
  • icon

    How I wouldn’t want to be renting now 😱😱🆘🆘

  • icon

    In some respects tenants are lucky. A great many will be living in properties that either aren't mortgaged or are owned by portfolio landlords who can spread the necessary rent increases across the whole portfolio not dump it all on the specific properties that have the mortgage increase.
    For example I have 5 mortgage fixes ending this year. The first one increased by around £450 a month, the second one was very small so we paid it off, the third one will be increasing by around £300, the next one by £590 and the other one by at least £709. We also have a tracker that has increased by over £500 a month. So over £2500 a month increase. Due to Section 24 the rent increase would need to be at least £3335 a month to cover the £2500. Those houses contain 22 tenants so that would be at least £150 per person per month increase. Nearly £38 of that is for HMRC as the extra Section 24 tax we pay. That's on top of the Section 24 bit they're already paying in their current rent. By spreading the increases across the whole portfolio they can be far more modest.
    Getting rid of Section 24 would make a huge difference.

  • icon

    Peter - I shall, along with every other NRLA member, look forward d to receiving the Section 21 link sent from the NRLA - I have my doubts it will appear.
    Regards
    Tim

    Peter Why Do I Bother

    They will get a reminder after a week Tim....

     
  • icon

    Peter. Well done some landlord that’s capable and willing of sending this to NRLA, I’m hopeless in this regard where computers are involved but to build a house no problem.
    Looks like we are going be banned if we are not capable of doing everything on line far more important than housing.
    We were better off when RLA & NLA were separate a bit of competition between them, now one straight road of self interest. Come Mr Richard Lambert we need you.

    icon

    Michael - you are not hopeless at all with regard to computers. You are one of the top contributors to housing issues on the internet.

    Peter is a star for contacting the NRLA!

     
    Peter Why Do I Bother

    Michael, the renewal has gone up from last year and there has been less action from them apart from being bombarded constantly with adverts. I will follow up again in a week if I have not heard anything will send again.

    If I still don't hear anything after two weeks then I will move to the Guild which is more expensive but they listened when I called them. NRLA is coming across as a bit corporate now to be honest.

    I sent it with a heading of Direct appeal to Ben Beadle

     
  • icon

    Peter, very good and if you want crowd funding I’ll be first to donate.

  • icon

    absolutely

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up