x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Labour chiefs say landlords are wealthy so rents should be frozen

A host of local Labour leaders including mayors Andy Burnham and Sadiq Khan are leading a call for an immediate private rent freeze.

They say most landlords are sufficiently wealthy to weather the current cost of living crisis, earning a median annual income before their income from rent of £55,415.

Against this claim they also say that “rent increases of 30-50 per cent are increasingly common.”

Advertisement

The mayors have been joined RMT rail union leader Mick Lynch and by a large number of less high profile Labour council chiefs, plus Green Party leaders, anti-landlord activists and charities in signing an open letter on the subject to Housing Secretary Michael Gove.

The letter says:

Dear Rt Hon Mr Michael Gove MP,

We are writing to urge the government to follow the Scottish government and introduce an immediate freeze on rents, to help renters weather the worst of the cost of living crisis and help prevent huge numbers of renters facing homelessness in the coming months. 

Rising costs of food and energy mean millions are struggling to make ends meet.  Last year 2.5 million renters were behind or constantly struggling to pay their rent.

At the same time, rents have been skyrocketing across the UK, rising fastest in Manchester, Bristol, Sheffield and Birmingham, reaching as high as 20.5 per cent.

Rents in London have gone up 17.5 per cent on average last up year, and rent increases of 30-50 per cent are increasingly common.

Renters are among the worst affected by the cost of living crisis. Prior to this crisis, renters were already spending four to five times as much as owner-occupiers on housing. 

Yet landlords, with the encouragement of letting agents, are using this crisis as an opportunity to introduce rent hikes. In September 2022 alone, one million renters faced a rent increase.

Some landlords will be struggling with increased mortgage costs, but many will not. 

Generation Rent research shows that just 11 per cent of rent increases in 2022 were the result of higher mortgage rates.

Just under half of rental properties have a mortgage and most of those have ‘interest only’ mortgages. The vast majority of landlords have far greater financial resilience to weather the storm ahead, with the median annual income of landlords before their income from rent is taken into account at £55,415.

In comparison, many renters are low paid, in precarious work and have no savings or assets. Some landlords that are facing increased mortgage costs are trying to pass those costs on to renters that simply cannot afford it. 

People living in private rented housing are all too often forgotten by the government. 

During the pandemic, the government introduced a temporary freeze for mortgage holders, but nothing close in comparison for those renting. Renters are still desperately waiting for the ban on no-fault evictions that the Government has been promising since 2019. Since last year there has been a 121.1 per cent increase in the number of households served a section 21 notice.

It comes as no surprise that 1.7 million households could become homelessness in these colder months. 

The immediate support renters need in the crisis is clear. The Scottish government has introduced a freeze on rents until at least March 2023, with an accompanying ban on evictions. 

However, the Scottish government does not have the power to embed support for low income mortgage holders within a rent freeze, whilst our Government does. 

A rent freeze could be accompanied by support for mortgage holders – ensuring renters and lower income homeowners do not lose their homes through the crisis.

The Mayor of London has repeatedly called for such measures to be introduced in England and Wales. A rent freeze would immediately relieve pressure on millions of people and halt an eviction crisis that would have a devastating social impact, and cost local councils and the government millions. 

The Government must now act to protect renters. We therefore call on the government to follow the lead of the Scottish government and:

- Introduce an immediate freeze on rents to protect renters;

- Implement an immediate ban on evictions until the cost of living crisis is over; 

- Deliver on the commitment to end section 21 by fast tracking the much-delayed Renters Reform Bill.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    I’m not taking on a new tenant now. It’s not worth my while. We went without to save to invest. We put the deposits down we paid to do the houses up. We put up with the abuse from tenants (well I don’t). We are at threat of fines. We are taxed more than what we earn. We pay higher mortgage rates than a home owner. There is no equity in the arrangement. Sell!!

  • George Dawes

    Totally out of touch politicians pontificating again , public sector gold plated pensions , claiming everything as expenses

  • icon

    meanwhile back in the real world 70% of landlords are lower tax rate payers, so im not sure what statistics theyve manipulated to come up with "with the median annual income of landlords before their income from rent is taken into account at £55,415."

    "Treasury minister Lord Agnew of Oulton revealed the numbers declaring income via self-assessment for letting property in 2019/20 showed that 1,519,000 landlords paid the basic rate of tax, 560,000 paid the higher rate of 40% and 106,000 paid the additional higher rate of 45%.

    He was responding to a Parliamentary question from Lord Carrington.

    icon

    Statistics can be spun any way that suits the narrative.
    While 70% of landlords may be basic rate tax payers what percentage of rental properties does that 70% own.
    How many higher or additional rate tax payers are only in those bands because of Section 24?

     
  • icon

    The problem with a 'letter' rather than a 'story' written by a journalist is that there is not even attempt at fact checking!

    I think the editors at Puffin should be looking at this letter & removing the 'lies, damn lies & statistics' to prevent children being harmed! It is as much a work of fiction as anything Dahl ever wrote!

  • icon

    Now that is good good Tricia, my sentiments exactly. Well said!

  • icon

    If (when) Labour get in , we are in so much trouble 😱😱👎🏻👎🏻. We have heard enough to make a balanced decision on if to stay or not, I am certainly out now, and that is even before the EPC C mess is sorted.

  • icon

    Who would have thought Removing Section 21 would have the ability to cause all this, collapse the housing market bring massive homelessness, make rents unaffordable and put tens of thousands in B&B.
    Wait until I have a Think didn’t we have this very problem decades ago which was why Section 21 was introduced.

  • icon

    Sorry but I just don't believe these figures
    "the median annual income of landlords before their income from rent is taken into account at £55,415."
    Also what about all the landlords that are artificially being pushed into higher rate tax by S24.

  • George Dawes

    Most people get rich by actually working , others do it by being politicians

    I'd like to see how much they earn with all the expenses on top etc

  • icon

    A landlord with a few properties may have a situation as follows:
    Total rent £100000
    Letting fees, insurance, repairs, safety checks £25000
    Taxable income £75000
    Personal allowance at zero tax £12500
    Next £37500 at 20% tax £7500
    Other £25000 at 40% tax £10000
    Mortgage payments of £35000
    20% tax credit of £7000
    Doesn't that mean they only have about £29500 take home?
    To have a portfolio of that size they will have put down sizeable amounts of their own tax paid money as deposits, which if invested elsewhere would attract a return.

    icon

    Yes Jo well put

     
    icon

    I forgot to add that if we were taxed in the same way as EVERY other industry on those figures we would be basic rate tax payers and pay £5000 less tax. Younger landlords wouldn't lose their Child Benefit.
    If we were treated as a business we could pay into a SIPP and get the pension tax relief that EVERYONE ELSE can get.
    If we had chosen to invest our money in ISAs instead of deposits for housing our returns would be tax free.
    We are massively discriminated against in every aspect with the current tax situation.

     
  • icon

    Jo. Well worked out very good illustration I will give you that.
    Another scenario but won’t be as accurate as yours a long time landlord turning over £200’000 un incumbent
    (£12’500 allowance) tax
    £37’500. @ 20% = £7’500
    £50’000 @ 40% = £20’000
    £25’000 @ 60% = £15’000
    £75’000 @ 45% = £33’750
    £76’250 one and half thousand a week tax I knew someone was paying it to keep the doss.
    I know there will be many costs
    associated with business including licensing but they are also gone in the wind anyway.
    So we haven’t got it they have.

    icon

    It's terrifying numbers. I'm dreading my end of year figures this year. I'm actually somewhere between your illustration and mine but with about 45% borrowing. About half of my mortgages come off their current fix at some point in 2023, so mortgage payments will increase significantly. As far as I can work out it's physically impossible to increase rents enough to cover the extra mortgage payments because the government will take 60% of any rent increase before the extra mortgage costs are factored in.

     
    icon

    Jo, I would do what I have done and sell some assets and be mortgage-free. You don't need the headache. Accept we live in a banana republic where a dictator will turn a business making money into a loss-making entity with one stupid decision without any thought whatsover (removal of section 24). I don't think it's worth doing business, investing your hard earned money into such a system. You can get much better returns in other countries with more stable governments not a 2.5 trillion debt-ridden, bankrupt bunch of scumbags.

     
  • icon

    It incredible and Mr Michael Gove wants to sell it as a fairer renting system, bankrupting landlords and causing mayhem for Tenants making rents unaffordable while pretending to be their friend, goodness me, how stupid he thinks we all are.

  • icon
    • B L
    • 24 February 2023 14:01 PM

    Labour chiefs, are we a communist country? Not only landlords' mortgages are increased more than 3 times, not all landlords are wealthier than tenants. This is a misconception that landlords are rich. Since 2000, population is 58.8 million, today is 67.7 million. That is about 9 million increase. How many homes did we build and what our government is doing about this? Labour and Conservative have responsibilities for this mess. 8 housing ministers were hired and fired at parties' convenience . It seems
    nobody can do this job and fix the issue. The key is how to make money for the country, not always take take and take from the people. Government is created to be creative, innovative to build the economy for their people. The problems we are having now are not caused by landlords, it is we lose control on the big players and the big picture.

  • icon
    • B L
    • 24 February 2023 14:15 PM

    We should not waste time on dealing with the extremists.

    icon

    The sad thing is, from 2024 these extremists will be in government 🤔

     
  • icon

    I know it’s Friday and the last thing you want is stressful week end.
    Many landlords don’t seem to realise Selective Licensing Schemes applies to Families.

    So if it is in operation in your area and in some places Its Borough wide licensing applies.

    This was the main reason why we let to Families because they were exempt, so now why bother.

    icon

    Michael Don’t understand. Are you saying SL in your area didn’t use to apply to families?

     
  • icon

    Jahan. yes unfortunately Selective licensing applies to Families not to be confused with HMO’s.
    Although almost the same its a licensing Scheme and all same documents and requirements apply

  • icon

    Jahan it only applied to 3 areas of our Borough before now 15 more wards.added by Mr Gove so it’s Borough wide.
    So generally if you had a family before you didn’t need a license but you are right.

  • icon
    • B L
    • 24 February 2023 22:57 PM

    Let's use each opportunity to vote and hit 100,000 to get a debate going in parliament:
    Sign on the link below -
    Reinstate Tax Relief Allowing Mortgage Interest to be Set Against Rental Income
    petition.parliament.uk/petitions/627785?reveal_response=yes

  • John  Bentley

    Supermarkets are wealthy, banks are wealthy, energy and fuel companies are wealthy but landlords are the only business not allowed to raise their rates???? Priceless.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up