x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Interest Rates - Property industry boss warns Bank of England

The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee meets next week to consider whether base rate should rise again - but there’s been a warning issued by a property industry chief.

Jonathan Rolande of the National Association of Property Buyers says some analysts fear house prices could fall as much as 30 per cent if interest rates - controlled by the base rate - do not fall soon.

And he says this month’s decision by the BoE represents a pivotal moment. 

Advertisement

 

 

“For those [buyers] with any kind of debt the rise and rise of rates, courtesy of the Bank of England, has chipped away at disposable income. We have all seen the shocking effect of inflation for ourselves whenever we go to the shops or switch on the heating. And these rate rises, combined with higher prices, are now really taking effect.

“House prices have begun to slip away from their eye watering peak, and there is a sense that the worst of inflation is now behind us. We can only hope those at The Bank of England feel the same way and spare homeowners from more rate rises. If they don’t we risk seeing prices fall even more in the future.”

The NAPB claims London has suffered the highest increase in mortgage bills  with average monthly repayments rising by £490 per month as a result of recent rate rises. 

The South East has had the second-biggest increase in mortgage costs but at the other end of the scale Scotland has experienced smaller average monthly mortgage cost rises of £169.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • George Dawes

    You ain’t seen nuthin yet

  • icon

    Wants savers to subsidize him and his cronies!

  • icon

    A 4-5% rate in terms of mortgage rate is normal, we have got used to rates which are artificially low, and people have over borrowed on the back of it. There is more to come.

    icon

    Are you crazy? It's not normal! The decade of cheap money pumps house prices. It would make sense to pay 4-5% of the interest rate for an average house price of around 180k, not almost 300k. Remember, The BoE do a survey and measures your sentiment. If you say, I'm okay with it, why do not lift interest even higher?

     
    icon

    Bart

    On my pints of beer index, houses are roughly the same price as they were 50 years ago - around 50,000 pints - but interest rates are still lower than then.

     
    icon

    It is more normal than the last ten years. If you look at interest rates over a 20-30 year it's about 6-7%. Those who thought cheap was around for ever are deluded. The BoE has been given a kick start by the Liz Truss budget fiasco but it was needed. The obsession of capital growth and foolish stamp duty hoilday in the pandemic which increased values recently have meant that first buyers had to take on larger mortgages inticed by low interest rates. It had to stop, pensions and savings have been hit and it has been a totally artifcial environment for 10 years but it was never normal.

     
    icon

    Robert Brown

    How much did you have to earn 50 years ago to be able to buy those 50,000 pints? I bet you that a lot less than you have to earn, even adjusted for inflation. In real terms, the vast majority of people not only in the UK (also here in Australia, and throughout the wolrd at large), salaries have been slowly decreasing in real terms for decades.

     
    icon

    The beer index is an interesting way to calculate.
    Back in the 1990s I was working in a nightclub and beer was about £3 a pint. My wages were £3.25 an hour. Now beer is about £5 or £6 a pint and minimum wage is nearly £10 an hour.

     
    icon

    Jesus

    I earned around £3000 and borrowed around £9000 to buy house for £11500. I know pints cost 2/6 in 1967 and think they were about 20p in 1974 when I bought the first house.

    I'm pretty sure pints and houses are more affordable now, but many young people prefer buying pints and cofffees to saving the deposit to buy their own house or flat.

     
  • icon

    In this climate at present . As they can increase interest rates whenever- it might make sense to leave things as is and see what happens.

  • George Dawes

    I recall in the 80s rates c 18%

    Imagine what that’s do 😂

    icon

    I remember it well, we did get MIRAS at that point though. Still eye watering!

     
    icon

    There would be chaos on Social Media 😂😂

     
  • icon

    Interest rates at 4% or 5% may have been normal many years ago but house prices were much lower then so monthly mortgage payments were far more affordable. Ultimately the only thing that matters is the monthly payment.
    People have paid whatever they have paid for their house because mortgage lenders have decided they can afford the monthly payments (and even if they suddenly can't the deposit was big enough to remove any risk of the lender making a loss).
    Most people are on 2 or 5 year mortgage fixes so the impact of 10 interest rate rises hasn't really been felt yet by existing home owners. Two of my mortgages come off their current fix next month and the monthly payments will more than double on the new fix or treble if I drift onto the SVR. How many homeowners could cope if their mortgage payments increased by over £500 a month? Most who have bought using the HTB scheme would be unlikely to be able to sell for enough to clear the debt so will be trapped in their current home with their current lender (if they are one of the ones that do no questions asked product switches) if they can afford the increased payments. If not they'll be homeless with no savings, a debt to clear and a destroyed credit rating. All because they were naive enough to believe that homeownership was the best thing they could do and renting was "Dead money".

    icon

    House prices go up on average by 100% every seven years regardless of of interest rates. The financial criis for home owners was averted but when that calmed down interest rates should have been slowly increased but didn't. The fact we came through this crisis is abit illusionary because we still have the fragility now. Easy to say but you can't take a debt without it being stress tested and most people were hoodwinked in paying over the odds for houses which is understandable but merely exacerbated the problem.

     
    icon

    Jo

    I agree with everything you say apart from your first sentence.

    I don't think house prices are substantially higher now than they were 50 or so years ago, either measured in pints of beer or salary multiples, and measured in cups of overpriced coffee they're substantially cheaper now.

    As you say, it's the monthly cost that matters most (especially as a proportion of take home pay). I bought my first house in 1974 for £11,500 on an endowment mortgage and I remember the monthly interest payments were around £95 with full tax relief taking them down to around £65 per month after tax.

    I sold that house in late 1977 for £17,500 (it would now be worth around £300,000) and bought my current (much nicer) house for around £30,000 with a new £25,000 endowment mortgage, paying around £225 per month interest together with endowment insurance payments around £5 (I was young and healthy then and lied about my lifestyle!). I am still in the same house, now worth well over £600,000 - so it's a bit more than 20 times what I paid for it but my final salary before retiring was also more than 20 times what I earned when I bought it.

    During the course of my mortgage payments, they soared to well over £700 per month at one point before falling way back to negligible amounts around 2010 - just as I finally paid the thing off!

    Negative equity is a risk that those buying an expensive property with a high LTV mortgage have faced from time to time, then inflation helps us climb out of it. I still think buying property is by far the best strategy, especially if we can buy more than one and have renters pay them off for us over our working lives.

    In buying my first house, I sacrificed the possibility of buying around 40,000 pints of beer but if I were to sell my whole portfolio now totally, I could buy around a million pints with the proceeds (ignoring CGT). I might then be homeless for the rest of my life - but would be oblivious to that and it wouldn't be for long!

     
    icon

    Interesting to hear the predicament of HTB buyers.
    As one commentator dubbed the scheme: Help To Buy:Votes.
    Perhaps I should have more sympathy for those who got a HTB mortgage; even though the Government help presumably partly relied on our taxes.
    But I have more sympathy for those who found themselves unable to buy because house price inflation was increased by HTB and Stamp Duty Holiday, as many predicted these would.
    Those suffering from the current effects of HTB Jo points out might get to blame the politicians who set up the market distorting scheme (the market now correcting itself). In doing so they can join the club of PRS Landlords being 'stuffed' by stupid politicians interfering. Though at least we shouldn't become homeless, even if some of our tenants might as LLDs sell up.

     
  • icon

    No not more affordable back then everything is relative and wages were so low.
    Suppose you wanted to buy a house to let back then there were no B2L Mortgage’s and virtually impossible interest
    only.
    The variable rate loans needed the proportion requirement of the principal income tax paid on it up front.
    Unlike B2L interest only loans could deduct all payments from income for tax purposes, no comparison really just add interest rates drop, you never had it so good.
    That’s why some ended up with scores of properties, but not that easy anymore, so now being rained in, no not easy years ago, wages were £20. pd not £30. ph.
    I am not going back to the’60’s either when top for a carpenter was 6s-1d per hour in old money, or early 70’s when top line was £29. pw for 6 days for trades person, what would you buy out of that, yes everything is relative except the perception.

    icon

    When I was last an employee in 1977 (HGV fitter for Eastern Electricity) my weekly pay was £39, take home £32, a modernised terraced house would be around £8k in Norwich and I think interest rates were around 6%, today the pay for a similar job would be around £500 a week, a similar house would be around £200k, and interest rates are now about the same, so yes it's all relative

     
    icon

    Andrew, your pay seems a bit low. I worked as a lifeguard in London in 1981, taking home £110 per week. We were paid in cash with the corner of the envelope open so we could count it before opening it.

     
    icon

    Maybe you earnt more being in London but my last pay packet in 1977 was £32 for the week, I remember it well

     
    icon

    Yes Andrew, I got extra for shift pay and London weighting. Also it included shifts working over the weekend with Sat at time and a half and Sunday and bank holidays at double time, remember weekends and overtime rates?

     
  • icon
    • B L
    • 17 March 2023 11:42 AM

    The Silicon Valley Bank is a martyr to the aggressive interest rate hikes. Let's hope BOE doesn't follow
    FED in the US and stay safe. HSBC came out to save the SVB UK branch. How many warnings do we need?

  • icon

    Apart from all this there is a another HOW TO RENT booklet packed with information how to destroy landlords, due out last week but now postponed until week. We had about 10 changes already since introduced by Shelter, I can’t bothered to count them anymore.
    They say if we don’t use this one that’s not available we can’t use S21.
    So it follows this must the reason for a further variation or they wouldn’t be doing it, just to prevent you repossessing your property under S.21 until they finally put the nail in the coffin in August.

  • George Dawes

    I recall when a mars bar was 10p

    I'm such an old git . lol

    icon

    I can remember when they were a bob, what does that make me ?

     
  • icon

    I remember in the early 70's I was given 50p. I was so excited it was enough to buy a whole handful of sweets.

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up