Fifth of landlords don’t trust agents on deposit handling 

Fifth of landlords don’t trust agents on deposit handling 


Todays other news
The next phase will begin in late 2026...
This is claimed in the latest Landlord Trends research from...
This comes from a survey by the Lettings Partnership...
The scheme is funded by a government but run through...
The Homes for Ukraine Scheme was launched in March 2022...

Around one in five landlords say they don’t trust agents to correctly handle rental income and tenancy deposits.

The Letting Partnership surveyed 890 landlords across England to understand attitudes towards trust, compliance and professional standards.

The research found that 19% of landlords do not trust letting agents to handle rental income and tenancy deposits correctly. 

The partnership says one potential factor behind this trust gap is the way compliance standards are communicated. 

Whilst 66% of landlords believe their letting agent is clear when communicating their compliance credentials and professional standards, more than a third (34%) do not.

The research also found that awareness of independent compliance reviews remains low. 

Three quarters of landlords (76%) were unaware that some letting agents voluntarily undergo independent reviews of their client accounting and operational processes, with just 24% aware that such reviews exist.

The partnership says the findings suggest that greater visibility around compliance standards could play a significant role in improving trust. An overwhelming 99% of landlords stated that an independently verified compliance review would increase their confidence in a letting agent.

The findings indicate that whilst many landlords already trust their agent, there is a clear appetite for greater transparency and independent verification when it comes to how client money is handled and how compliance standards are maintained.

Chris Mason, chief operating officer of The Letting Partnership, comments: “The fact that almost every landlord surveyed said an independently verified compliance review would increase their confidence demonstrates that transparency matters. 

“It’s not enough to be compliant; increasingly, landlords want evidence that the right controls, processes and safeguards are actually in place.

“For agents, that presents a real opportunity. Those who can clearly demonstrate how they manage client money, maintain compliance standards and independently verify their processes will be best placed to build trust and differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive market.”

Share this article ...

Join the conversation: Login and have your say

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions. All comments are screened using specialist software and may be reviewed by our editorial team before publication. Landlord Today reserves the right to edit, withhold or delete comments that violate our guidelines, including those that harass, degrade, or intimidate others. Users who post such content may be banned from commenting.
By commenting, you agree to our Commenting Terms of Use.
Subscribe to comments
Notify of
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Recommended for you
Related Articles
Deposit alternative service responds to Citizens Advice criticism...
The change is in response to the Renters Rights Act...
Some prospective tenants are in danger of becoming “unlettable” as...
In response to Guardian newspaper reports that the Chancellor is...
A paper is to be published after the May local...
Wandsworth council proved the tenant was not the owner...
Recommended for you
Latest Features
Sarah Thompson is Group Financial Services Director at Mortgage Scout,...
Simon Bones is the founder and CEO of Genous, a...
Perhaps the greatest issue with commonhold is a lack of...
Sponsored Content

Send to a friend

In order to send this article to a friend you must first login. Click on the button below to login or sign up.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x