x
By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies to enhance your experience.
Graham Awards

TODAY'S OTHER NEWS

Why are landlords hated? Is it down to the BBC and rest of the media?

A prominent lettings sector expert is blaming the media for anti-landlord sentiment and a rise in tenancy disputes.

Gina Peters, Head of Landlord & Tenant at Dutton Gregory Solicitors, says she’s also seen a rise in ‘housing disrepair experts’ painting many landlords as 'non-compliant', in order to market their services.

Peters says: “This is very much a case of perception versus reality, with the media creating this story that all landlords are not to be trusted. Most landlords are in fact compliant but lack support from the Government.

Advertisement

“Due to little funding and incentives for the industry, yes, we have seen a rise in disputes. The Government has created a very hostile environment, with the intended abolishment of Section 21 causing an increase in notices being served, more landlords selling up their portfolios due to financial pressure and uncertainty, and little to no support to make  properties more energy efficient and safer for tenants. This together with a rise in these new anti-landlord style companies for tenant disputes, have led to a belief that many landlords are failing to comply with the legalities of renting property in England.

“Local authorities who would normally investigate these claims and disputes are underfunded and under-resourced. There are now many licence schemes in place, which differ in each borough and can catch landlords out unintentionally.

“With the rise in these new style tenant-oriented companies it is painting, in many cases, a landscape that suggests landlords are there to be sued. Many of the applications that these new companies are handling can be made to the First Tier Tribunal by tenants themselves as there are no costs to be gained from such action from a landlord.

"I accept that some tenants may not be aware of their rights, but there is a fine line between providing legal advice and jumping on the bandwagon to ensure landlords are sued at the first hint of non-compliance.  It is not helping the overall landscape within the private rented sector.”

Peters has advised clients through the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, the Housing Act 1988 and 1996, and the Deregulation Act 2015 – and now the 2023 Renters Reform Bill.

Want to comment on this story? Our focus is on providing a platform for you to share your insights and views and we welcome contributions.
If any post is considered to victimise, harass, degrade or intimidate an individual or group of individuals, then the post may be deleted and the individual immediately banned from posting in future.
Please help us by reporting comments you consider to be unduly offensive so we can review and take action if necessary. Thank you.

  • icon

    Pretty much spot on

  • icon

    Agree about time to someone told it how it is. ITV Channel 3 one of the worst every evening knocking Landlords non stop, add LBC who have gave years knocking landlords but recently taken their foot off the gas now that the damage is done.
    All this attacking landlord have created so much homelessness, driven temporary Hotel accommodation sky high and putting them up in B&B costing taxpayers fortunes no wonder the incompetent bias Councils are broke just add Michael Gove the so called Housing Secretary and the picture is complete.

    icon

    Politicians have caused all this anti Landlord hatred and they the politicians are experts at ` divide and rule `. Of course politicians do this hoping that they will get more votes and more power over any business that they decide to interfere with and its private landlords and private tenants who pay the price..this is one of the reasons why I have not voted for any politician over the past 30 years.

     
    icon

    No body wants to admit that the countries economic problems were caused by Brexit and incompetent handling of the COVID pandemic. Instead it's easier for politicians to get the public to blame each other.

     
    icon

    @ MALCOLM LYTTON - nothing to do with Brexit, everything to do with government incompetence.

     
  • George Dawes

    BBC selling off tv centre which we paid for with our taxes !

    Ian Deaugustine

    You are right. There are good reasons why I do not have a TV, don't watch such rubbish even in a hotel, and I encourage everyone to dispose of TVs and not to pay for a TV License. Your life will improve, you will read books, have new hobbies and have a much better life.

     
    icon

    BBC are not covering the Angela Rayner tax avoidance scandal and LBC sympathetic towards her and reminding us Tory MP’s do worse things. I tend to stream all my tv so I can escape the left wing bias.

     
    icon

    Margaret, the BBC won't have a word said against Darth Rayner.

     
    icon

    Annoyed - The Force is strong with her.

     
    icon

    Nick, darth Rayner is not on the good side. May the 4th? Sounds like an election date . . .

     
  • icon

    A good article, spot on for once. We all know how this has occurred….. But how does it stop 😬🤷‍♂️. There is so much momentum that I fear it’s just too ⏰ late.

  • icon

    I have never paid the TV license. They are a waste of space. F them.

  • icon

    Section 21 being referred to as a “no fault “ eviction giving the impression that a greedy landlord is evicting a poor tenant rather than doing repairs etc. I’m sure that the vast majority of section 21’s are issued to end a contract for perfectly legitimate reasons such as non payment of rent. Section 21 is an onerous process and I would much rather do repairs etc. than issue one.

    Having said that, I am considering issuing one while I still can to a tenant who told me to eff off when I tried to increase his rent from £550 per month to £600 He has been on that rent for 4 years and the market rate is now £850. Any recommendations for legal services offering section 21 procedure would be greatly appreciated.

    icon

    Indeed.
    In reality this should be 'no reason provided'.
    As we all know, there is always a reason .... and in a large proportion of cases, tenant fault!

     
    icon

    Get rid of them asap before Labour ban you from doing so 😬

     
    Yvonne Gray

    One story I saw on a tenant blog, was about a tenant refusing to pay rent, to which someone replied….
    “Anyone can stay for up to a year rent-free. Longer if they know how to play the game”.

    With this kind of mentality, it’s no wonder landlords are going out of business. For small scale landlords, that’s their livelihood.

     
    icon

    I suggest you tell him what the going rate is and suggest he takes it to the tribunal. but warn him they are likely to set the rent a lot higher than what you have asked for!
    If he still doesn't want to pay your modest increase, serve a sectioon 21 notice, get him out and re-let for £850 per month.
    I have long standing tenants whose rent I have raised by £50 per year for the last two years. It is stil llower than the going rate but they realise that everything is going up and appreciate me putting it up in smaller amounts each year.

     
    Peter Why Do I Bother

    Peter,

    Speak to Possession Friend, spot on and great advice.

     
    icon

    I used Helix Law who I was happy with.

     
    icon

    Thanks for the recommendations. I’ll check them out

     
    icon

    I used a company called the Landlord Group. Glad I did as the paperwork needs to be spot on and documentation up to date. I used the do it yourself service as much as possible but they checked my procedures and did the paperwork. Julian Meek was my point of contact. On their advice I also changed the locks. I represented myself at Court and I think the whole experience cost me around £1,000 not including loss of rent.

     
    icon

    Tell him Peter- if u can find what u have here at 550.00 then I’ll leave it. If not either pay the uplift or F off.

     
    icon

    Peter in my 20 plus years as a landlord I have found that the behaviour of a bad tenant NEVER improves but just gets worse. I would get rid of this tenant before they abolish S21 and you are stuck with him. There are a lot of decent tenants out there who would be really grateful to rent from you at market rate and be pleasant to deal with.

     
    icon

    Thanks again for your recommendations and advice.
    As you say Catherine, a bad tenant’s behaviour gets worse. His certainly has so I’m leaning heavily towards eviction. I feel bad about it as he’s lived there a long time but I can’t take the risk of being stuck with him when Labour get in. My other properties all have overseas tenants, mostly Moldovan/ Romanian and they’ve been good as gold. At the risk of stereotyping, the only ones I have had a problem with are British, in this particular case on benefits too.

     
    icon

    Peter, please keep us updated and get that Section 21 issued. To be blunt, any tenant that told me to eff off would receive a S21 the same day! 😡
    It is the polite version of eff off. 😂

     
    icon

    Agreed Peter generally my overseas tenants have been good the problems come with the entitled British tenants

     
  • icon

    And even Private Eye which usually seems to me to be a well balanced source of news. When it mentions landlords/tenants it takes the government line without looking at the downsides of removing section 21 etc.

  • Ian Deaugustine

    Most journalists are frustrated and constantly seeking new targets for people's hunger and hatred.

  • icon

    The media is influenced by what it hears and the majority of what it hears is from the various campaign groups. All they hear from us as a group is lacklustre defence from the NRLA with no positive PR being pumped out in the opposite direction. It’s no good simply being on the defence all the time as that gets us nowhere. We as a group should demand more of the NRLA otherwise we simply get what we deserve. Please please please NRLA form a proper PR department, sideline Ben Beadle whose efforts are appreciated but wide of the mark and get some proper positive spin out there!!

    icon

    “Ben Beadle’s efforts are appreciated “. Really?🤔 It doesn’t take much effort to roll over. I don’t recall any of his “efforts” to keep Section 21.

     
    Peter Why Do I Bother

    Sorry Dom but Ben Beadles About efforts are completely not what landlords need. The guy has taken the stance of saying nothing while the frenzy around landlords plays out.

    For 100k members he should have the loudest voice in the whole debate…

     
    icon

    As I have said before there needs to be a new Landlord association as NRLA only seem to care about student landlords.

     
  • icon

    We are viewed as criminals carrying out a form of community service (providing housing), rather than as investors in property with customers with whom we contract.

  • Yvonne Gray

    Clearly we need a flow of good-landlord stories fed to the media which editors can find interest in publishing, and directors looking for new angles to televise, as a balancing force.
    So - what can we proactively do about this?

    icon

    I agree with you Yvonne. I have been a landlord for 40 years and some of my dearest friends are ex tenants. I enjoyed being a landlord back then in a relaxed environment. I didn’t need to be told to provide good quality accommodation. It just made good business sense.

     
  • icon

    An article that speaks some truth for a change - but who wants to hear the truth these days (Donald Trump knows it!). It's not just the media fuelling the anti landlord rhetoric it's also social media. It seems to be a part of the general anger and hatred that is alive and growing in our society - where's the kindness, where's the trust, where's the give and take? Tenant groups spend so much time inciting tenants against the landlord that we have almost become victims, cowering in fear of making a mistake that will land us in court.
    I trusted a young man once who needed a place to rent, he told me he was ex-army and struggling to find a home - I rented a two bed semi to him at a low rent. He repaid me by growing cannabis in one of the bedrooms during covid, wrecking the place, leaving dog poo all over the garden and owing me £4000 when I eventually got him out. I have one buy to let left now and use a letting agent to manage it. It's rented to a nice Eastern European family, two small kids but no pets, they keep it very clean and have restored my faith in tenants to some extent.

    icon

    Trust? that's an old word, trust no one and you won't go far wrong

     
  • icon

    Absolutely. Whenever the BBC use the word landlord they use a derogatory adjective in front of it. LBC are very anti landlord too.

  • icon

    For me, the biggest change since we started in BTL almost 20 years ago (when interest rates and margins were similar to now on average sized family homes) is attitude. Back then we had good relationships with tenants and provided/maintained good quality homes at reasonable rent. In return, in the main, the tenants looked after the houses pretty well. Most left by their own choice but on the rare times of using section 21 for various reasons, tenets took it as meant and found another home with appropriate referencesand no need to go to court at all. These days all vocal agencies including media (social and mainstream), CAB, tenants organisations and even local councils, are making this seem like a evil breech of human rights and actively encouraging tenants to sit tight and go to court at no expense to themselves. Hence the feeling mentioned above, that it is a way to get a year rent free.
    So the courts have backlogs, the bailiffs have backlogs and landlords like us will sell the house when we finally get it back.

    icon

    Well said!

     
  • icon

    Let's not forget the likes of Gen Rent, Shelter et al adding to the pile-on. If you believe them, 95% of properties are sub-standard, their tenants are all freezing and we are throwing them out on the street for the fun of it.

    Peter Why Do I Bother

    If they carry on Martin we will be throwing them out on the street and selling up.

     
  • icon
    • B L
    • 12 April 2024 12:49 PM

    Still prefer the old journalism etiquette, reporting the news, writing the story objectively. Providing information is the media's major function in the society. Journalists shouldn't take side in public eyes. Today, The media worship ratings, and readers use their viewing behaviour to support gossip and sensational news. This vicious cycle has resulted in the appearance of today’s media. To be fair, there are still some elegant journalists in BBC. Why this article headline did not mention other media who have strong bias?

  • Malcolm Stretten

    Forget the BBC, the real reason landlords are hated is government policy. Ever since Osborne and Cameron started the mood music back in 2015 things have got worse. Why? Because they want to replace small private landlords with the City friends and build-to-rent companies.

    Secondly, it makes them look more cuddly towards tenants. And tenants are usually YOUNG people who will simply vote longer! And the Tories know that landlords have nowhere to run.

    icon

    I don't know about running, but I have walked to REFORM.

     
  • icon

    Also landlords,have no money for repairs, not all .because of court costs with tenant evictions,

  • icon

    Andy Marshall, well done even when I used Solicitors years ago now cost £2’300. I believe a lot more difficult now any excuse to throw it out, Whether the Deposit wasn’t protected correctly or in time, if you hadn’t served latest addition of How 2 Rent guide before signing the Contact or you should have had a license but didn’t, given them the gas certificate and EPC loads of little lame duck excuses to cheat you. I would be careful about changing locks and make sure you have the Order in your hand first as they always seem to get extra time after Court day to get out regardless of arrears, anyway congrats.

  • icon

    The government has, intentionally or not, created a hostile environment - a historical colonial divide-and-rule atmosphere - where several parties with different agendas have been used to battle against each other for a
    Government party to force through policies that might otherwise not be acceptable to the public. The big players are the government seeking votes and a cheap way out of the housing crisis by enacting an array of unfair regulatory laws; 2M landlords whose income and investment are no longer certain; tenants who are told by the government and their financed charities that landlords charge too much and provide a poor service; and the Councils that are funded less by central government and forced to find income from landlords and housing developers - this melting pot is, of course, all about money and very little about moral righteousness. Oddly, very few of the above parties are taking a pragmatic view. Instead, extreme views, policies and regulations are popping up and becoming the norm that, to any outsider, can see is a recipe for absolute disaster. It is easy to predict that the outcome will, if it's not already, lead to Councils becoming unable to function due to restricted finances, landlords investing elsewhere, and successive governments seen as incompetent and unable to solve major issues of the day.

    icon

    Excellent post, Robin.

    It is amazing that the main stakeholders - the landlords - have had no representation at all in relation to the extremist policies being enacted against them.

     
  • icon

    Intenionally that's for sure they know what they are doing

  • icon

    I messaged LBC phone-in last night telling them how it is in no uncertain terms.
    Low & behold if a Landlord did respond and said Landlords are greedy and that I should take a look in the mirror, a saying I had previously used on here so he no be on here to. He also said he only put up his Rent 12% in several years which is more than I did. Obviously he hasn’t been hit yet and living in clover in dream land, I doubt if he’s has done Licensing yet which cost me thousands per property, neither he nor I mentioned this or Section 24.
    Have a nice day.

  • icon

    Conservative party has been privatising everything, they are privatising NHS through the back door. They created the small landlords as we know it now. They brought in ASTs and so on. There is always a backlash against all types of privatisation. Right now, it is against small Landlords. So they are trying to appease the tenants and creating a mess in the process. They hope large companies will take our place. It is another failure because, tenants want cheap and good accommodation, which cannot be provided by large companies as they have investors to satisfy. Where as Small landlords don't always increase the rents each year. The small landlords in general want good tenant, looking after property, paying their rent on time.
    So tenants are loosing the very people they could have relied on for cheaper rent. Why, because some are naive, some are jealous or envious and some have ideological issues such as housing is a human right and health is a human right and son.
    Ultimately once the small private landlords are gone, some will admit their mistake, some will blame the tenants, some will blame the small landlords and some will blame incompetent government.
    The fact is PRS for small landlords will be gone soon. So prepare and move on.

  • icon

    I agree Pat
    Big companies high rents that were its going

icon

Please login to comment

MovePal MovePal MovePal
sign up